Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a class of timepieces that's normally used for even ten percent of its potential.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the individual has secured his wrist into the max after a dip and a couple of strokes, then return instantly to couch under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use, it's only the fault of old habits at least as much as the introduction of the so-called divers of the contemporary age that dates back into the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of their well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -movie additionally winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well one of the first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist thanks to his fabric strap became a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown shield shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the brands in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 shift, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most famous secret agent in the world, and obviously also the watch whose role has been played by the Omega Seamaster for many years.
But beyond their actual use in this large family whose origins would simply have to deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even when you have to wash the hands.
However, a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of these fascinating references.
I have a long-standing friend who is a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.
A True wrist sub Has to Be able click here to ensure these performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the system that reports the dive read more time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its movement, either quartz or mechanical
However, the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches need to adhere to specific rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, what we all know is the best, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to provide attributes considerably milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to only immerse the surface in maximum safety, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but this isn't so when it's done a trivial swim in the sea. It would be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely on a screw-on crown, better still if protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the watertight status of this submerged timepieces?
Precisely for those who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal is to have the ability to rely upon a system that visually signals on the dial in case the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore at a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dive watch may have to be rushed to a service center, before seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism indefinitely. This function currently exists, but on very few models, which frankly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and as a result, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown snugly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume pick on the fly either leave your diver somewhere safe, or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a little 'of issues linked to the time that must meet the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I have divided them into two categories. The sequence in which they appear doesn't represent any position.